Pay No Attention To Men Behind The Curtain

Thursday, May 13th, 2010

Author David W. Franklin

AH!, here are two too obvious but simple, irrefutable truths:

FACTS by way of REASON & KNOWLEDGE:

No. 1

IF… Congress was truly given the power to delegate to a private corporation ONE of their powers, then they have to power to delegate each and every one of those powers granted to them in Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution.

So……what is stopping them, and why doesn’t Congress delegate to separate, individual private corporations, each and every one of the powers granted to them in Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution?

There would then be NO NEED for a Washington D.C. Capital or all the meetings and hearings held there.

Having so delegated, the members of Congress could stay home in their districts, continue to draw and enjoy their large salaries and superlative health benefits, and be a leisure. Think of all the expense of jet fuel that would be saved!

WHY NOT? Why don’t they do that? Why don’t they delegate to private corporations, each and every one of all the other powers of Article I, Sec. 8?

The only reason for then not demolishing the auspicious buildings that house the meetings of the Senate and House would be to preserve them for the Annual Grand Parties that would be held to celebrate their absolute freedom from ever having to do any Thing for their paycheck or oath of office.

No. 2.

There are THREE BRANCHES of GOVERNMENT:

The EXECUTIVE, whose responsibility is to execute by Sacred Oath, the Laws made in pursuance to the letter, spirit and intent of The Supreme LAW.

The LEGISLATIVE, whose responsibility by sacred oath, is to legislate, to make Laws in pursuance to the letter, spirit and intent of The Supreme LAW.

and,

The JUDICIARY, whose responsibility by sacred oath, is to ensure the Laws made and executed by the other two branches, are constitutional and conform to the letter, spirit and intent of The Supreme LAW.

Well, are we a Nation of Laws, or a Nation where men and private corporations determine law and say what is right and what is wrong?

The question is, WHICH of the three branches of the Federal Government write/make the law that defines exactly what a Dollar is?

Could it be the “Law making” branch of the federal government, the LEGISLATIVE branch?

THINK AGAIN! The correct answer is: NONE OF THE ABOVE ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

FACT:

A private, completely NON-GOVERNMENT bank controls the supply of credit and currency, whether it be in paper or electronic form.

PROOF:
When, on January 28th 2010, Timothy Geithner, the current Secretary of the U.S. Treasury was asked on PBS’s NIGHTLY BUSINESS REPORT whether he favored “nationalizing” the banks, he answered as follows, and I quote from the transcript:

“We have a financial system that is run by private shareholders, managed by private institutions and we’d like to do our best to preserve that system.”
Geitner was President of the Federal Reserve Bank in New York! As an Insider, he would know!

On March 17, 2009, during the McNeil News Hour, PBS aired a short program titled:
“WHEN THE GOVERNMENT WRITE CHECKS, WHERE DOES THE MONEY COME FROM?”
Here is the link: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/business/jan-june09/solman_03-17.html

I quote below, in relevant parts:
“Federal Reserve creates money

PAUL SOLMAN:
“No wonder the less enterprising among us put our trust in Uncle Sam’s money. But here’s a source of confusion when it comes to that money. It’s not paper that the Fed creates when it makes the new money for its bailouts and the like.”

DAVID WYSS, Chief Economist, Standard & Poor’s:
“All it really is, is an electronic transfer into the bank account. And if they want to buy mortgage-backed securities, all you do is send an electronic signal to the bank and get the securities and exchange.”

PAUL SOLMAN: “And then the bank has that amount on deposit from the Fed?”

DAVID WYSS: “That’s what federal funds are. The Fed creates money. That’s its job. That’s a central bank’s job.”

PAUL SOLMAN: “But what’s the difference between minted money and Federal Reserves, we asked economist Simon Johnson?”

SIMON JOHNSON, MIT Sloan School of Management:
” It’s quite funny. The Federal Reserve insists, absolutely categorically, “We do not print money. That’s the U.S. Mint that prints money.”
“But, of course, the Fed issues money. It’s a great deal, right? Instead of having to print it on a printing press, you just do it digitally. It doesn’t actually cost you anything, hardly anything to issue these new digits, these new bits of code on a computer somewhere.

PAUL SOLMAN:
“In other words, these Federal Reserves or federal funds are just digital promises, computer blips, not cash, but just as good, no different than the money in your checking account.”
“So the Fed is creating money, even if it’s not minting it, something like $600 billion new electronic dollars in the past year. But that’s not the only way the government is coming up with money to try to quell the crisis. It’s also been borrowing money from investors all over the world.”

In his interview by CBS News, the chairman of the private bank was asked if it is tax money that he is spending?

Here is the link:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/12/60minutes/main4862191_page6.shtml

Quoting exactly from the transcript, here is his answer:
“It’s not tax money. The banks have accounts with the Fed, much the same way that you have an account in a commercial bank. So, to lend to a bank, we simply use the computer to mark up the size of the account that they have with the Fed. It’s much more akin to printing money than it is to borrowing.”

QUESTIONS:
Well, if it is NOT tax dollars and NOT tax money Mr. Bernanke is sending, and he is using the computer to “mark up” the size of the account, what then, IS…he sending them for dollars?

When the Chairman of this private bank increases the accounts of member banks, does he “send” them “tax money”, “tax dollars”?, or dollars as defined by the LEGISLATIVE, Law making branch of government?

OR….. does he send them “digital promises”, “computer blips”, “electronic dollars”?

Has the Law Making branch of the federal government made a law that says “digital promises”, or “computer blips”, or “electronic dollars” are dollars by law?

IF not, is the private central bank breaking the Law by making something else “dollars” that are not dollars by law?

Is the private central bank making its own law, as to what a dollar is?
Are we a nation of Laws, or “laws” made up by men in private corporations, to increase their profits?

In delegating it’s Article I, Section 8 monetary powers to a private corporation, did Congress also delegate away its supreme power to make Law?

If so, where is found in the U.S. Constitution, the power to delegate the power to make law?

Remember all the nation wide & world wide panic? Remember they called it a credit crisis?

Remember the BIG BANK BAILOUT?, wherein the banks said they lost over $750 Billion dollars?

Remember all the media hype hype and fear mongering testimony by the chairman of the private central bank, as well as the secretary of the U.S. Treasury before the U.S. Congress?

Remember how the Secretary of the Treasury, in private “closed door” meetings with the most important representatives from the House and Senate, told them that if the $750 billion bank bailout was not passed, there would be a “nuclear winter” of economic consequences, mass unemployment, a new even greater Great Depression, civil unrest, even riots?

REMEMBER ALL THAT ? ? ? ? ? Was all that the Truth, or lies?

MORE VERY IMPORTANT QUESTIONS:
Since all the chairman of the private central bank had to do to replace the “lost” $750 billion, was to take about one minute of his time, type that digital number on his computer keyboard, hit the ‘ENTER’ key and “send an electronic signal” to make “an electronic transfer” of the $750 billion, into the member bank accounts………

Then……………… WHY? Was there any credit crises in the first place?

Why…for weeks and weeks, all the fear mongering to the public, by every form of corporate electronic and print media?

Why……all the fronting of “testimony” before Congress, all the meetings, all that immense expenditure of human energy and ‘Time of Life’ Capital,

WHY? ? ? ? ?

WHEN, to end in a matter of seconds, the alleged credit and banking “crisis”, and all the losses on Wall Street, both to the banks AND WE THE PEOPLE,

“….all the chairman of the private central bank had to do to replace the “lost” $750 billion, was to take about one minuteof his time, type that digital number on his computer keyboard, hit the ‘ENTER’ key and “send an electronic signal” to make “an electronic transfer” of the $750 billion, into the member bank accounts………”

WHY?

Can you say the word “FRAUD”?

Can you say the phrase “Fraud on a National scale”?

Can you say the phrase “Fraud on a World wide scale”?

WHO….do YOU think, had, and has THE UNLIMITED POWER ($ $ $ $ $)….to create, perpetrate and ‘pull off’ such a gargantuan fraud, and bring it to a theater near every human being in the world?

WHO ?

No related posts.

7 comments on “Pay No Attention To Men Behind The Curtain”


  1. CheriVNB says:

    Is this the ‘sterile’ article you promised? Who (and why) is the question I have been asking for more than 2 years. I am a ‘little’ person. Just worrying about my small piece of the world and taking care of my family (2 girls). Too many people don’t even know what makes a ponzi scheme a ponzi scheme. Off loading responsibility, even the small stuff puts you at risk. Anyone saying “Trust me” can’t be trusted.
    It all boils down to “What is the purpose of Life?” If you believe we just exist, this is what you get: everyman for himself, exploiting the fools born every minute. The trickster has had his day. Today I am ashamed of being an American, not because Az has passed a law trying to deal with illegals, but because our “leaders” political and industrial have been seduced by the darkness.
    Which makes me wonder… How do you break a deal with the Devil? ~C

  2. The lust for power and hence control. Slavery is alive in well in America. Today we are not bound by chains but taxes.
    That I will end up living in the woods is a foregone conclusion. The only question is why. Whether the result of wanting to exercise a bit of liberty, avoiding capture from an oppresive government, or as a result of impoverishing economic policy, the result is the same. I am in the woods.
    Without real hope, is when I’m most dangerous. It’s when we all are most dangerous. It’s when we stop bickering over the scraps of liberty guaranteed by the Constitution and start spilling blood for unlimited freedom. Restore the Republic.

  3. You mean you actually believe that the US is still operating under the constitution????? Wake up and smell the BS. The US government gave up even attempting to hide the fact that the constitution is a dead letter this go around. Remember the contracts called bonds that US auto makers sold and were under contract to pay back, even if it meant selling off their assets? Remember how under the reasoning of getting the US economy back in order they negated them, leaving the lenders out in the cold, against so called standing US laws? They not only don’t care about the constitution, they don’t even care about any laws at all. It’s whatever they want to do to get re elected. The American people have become so cowed that they roll over and wet themselves when told to by those they elect. It is after all, “for our own good”.


  4. CheriVNB says:

    Dave,

    As I read your article I imagined liberal refrains of “See, how do you like it?” or “That is how blacks, the poor, illegals, ______, etc see America.” The “disenfranchised” have never experienced life without “slavery”.
    I was BLESSED to be born to very hardworking, patriotic and decent people. While I can echo the sentiment of being less hopeful and gravely concerned, caution should rule the day. Months ago I posted somewhere about the “puppet strings” being strung through the culture and economy. How laughably naïve I was. They are not strings, but fine gauge piano wires which will go great damage when pulled tight. The unscrupled (for lack of a better term) on both sides (left/right or Dem/Rep) are facilitating this usurpment of the peoples’ power by rabble rousing, singling out groups, (rich, poor, Wall Street, bankers, unions, etc.) and outright misleading EVERYONE! November will be here soon and with luck and hard work some changes may be made that will slowdown the rate of destruction. At the state local levels some serious messes are brewing, especially here in CA. Seriously under funded pensions, over promised benefits to individuals, cities, teachers, students, municipalities, etc. just to name a few. We can’t all run to the woods. The problems will be there too, sooner or later.~C

  5. Fantastic, Dave. You deserve a longer answer and will get one, but if I don’t put my weary body in bed I’ll be typing with my nose.

  6. I still believe in the Constitution. I still believe these states united to form America can restore the republic for which it stands. I have no illusions that our currnet government is operating within the confines of the Constitution or are even giving it lip service. I also have no illusion that a constitutional republic is a perfect form of government, but I do believe that it is the best model available. Most importantly I believe that we stand upon a great precipise. A single step away from losing the Republic of America.
    Many years ago I took an solemn oath to protect and defend the Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic. To defend the Constitution, not the government, not the court rulings, not the pompous arrogant fools that have led us to the precipise. Liberty, the exercise of freedom, demands of its practioners sacrifice and vigilance. I’ll stand beside you or against you, but stand I will. Restore the Republic.

  7. Correction
    …”our current government is NOT operating within the confines”….
    …”a constitutional republic is NOT a perfect form of government”…
    My appologies.

Leave a comment

Calendar

Tags