Goodbye Arnie Part 1

Friday, July 27th, 2012

Author Tony De Maio

Goodbye Arnie (Part I)

Dear Arnold,

I am writing to say “goodbye”. Though California has been my home since 1945, I have decided to sell my house and move to another state. During these past many years, I have worked as a teacher/administrator and a state employee (analyst/manager/administrator). I watched California change; first with pride, then concern, and now alarm.

I watched as California grew into a happy, prosperous “community” with productive citizens that were independent, peace loving, law-abiding, hard working, and charitable. Welfare was uncommon and a last resort—not a way of life. Crime was rare—we seldom locked our doors, and didn’t even lock our bicycles at school. I recall the proud boast that “California has the finest roads and the finest schools.” Today, California has excellent pot holes in their roads and superb metal detectors in their schools.

I recall the time when “close enough for government work” was considered high praise. Indeed, the various governments set high standards and demanded quality work. State employees were highly trained and motivated. I remember the “California Master Plan for Higher Education”, where our government made a sacred promise that if we taxed ourselves and provided the money, higher education would be forever free of tuition costs. At the time, we had faith in our government and willingly taxed ourselves. Elected officials and Civil Servants were trusted and held in high regard. Recent surveys show that regard and trust has vanished. Apparently, that faith was misplaced.

What happened to “my” state? What happened to make the roads worse than the schools; and the schools rank 47th in the nation? Why is there a “rough road” sign on an interstate? What happened to tarnish the honored occupations of teacher, civil servant, and legislator?

I have watched both from the outside and inside as state departments doubled in size with no change in workload. I have watched commissions double and triple their fees within a few years, then indulge in an orgy of needless spending. I have watched as units were repeatedly created out of whole cloth in order to give a favored employee a promotion. I have watched as units were abolished, but the people remained—playing cards, watching television, and oftentimes not even showing up. Eventually, they found another job somewhere, and they were then replaced. I have watched totally unqualified people get positions because of sexual favors and/or affirmative action and/or political influence. They not only obtained “positions”, but they were placed in high level positions where they supervised their betters and created morale problems and chaos. I watched as the state work force deteriorated and managers tried to make up in quantity what was lacked in quality—as they were forced to hire “more of the same”. One IT shop hired no “new blood” for 15 years, and obtained all their personnel by promoting clerks. Those clerks are now high level managers—and they know little more now than when they were hired.

I have watched as the legislature(s) and governor(s) “paid back” the state unions by granting large pay raises to state employees to where now state and local government workers earn an average of $39.50 per hour ($82,000/yr) in total compensation. Private workers earn an average of $26.09 an hour ($54,000/yr). [BLS figures] Their benefit and retirement package is not that of a Cadillac; it more closely resembles a 747.

I have watched as displaced politicos became “professors” at our universities and colleges until their political party regained power and they could return to government positions. Some do not return. In like manner, I have watched as hundreds of boards and commissions were created for trivial purposes in order to supply jobs for political hacks. (In addition, others obtained civil service jobs by means of political influence.)

I have watched as major projects failed and tens of millions of dollars were wasted. Those responsible not only were not held accountable, but they were promoted. I have seen major corruption uncovered, only to watch as those responsible were given high level jobs in other states, then returned to California government after the “heat was off”, and those that reported it were punished. I watched as state employees who cooperated with the FBI in a legislative sting were sent to Coventry as the legislators were sent to jail.

I have watched as the California crime rate has soared, and streets where once women safely walked unescorted have become streets where policemen fear to go.

I have watched as the sacred trust of spending the public treasury has been betrayed. Instead of being used for the public good, the funds are used to buy votes, construct ornate and lavish office buildings, reward cohorts and followers, and sweetheart contracts with supporters that would give kickbacks (or gave campaign contributions)—oftentimes for unneeded goods and services. Those that reported such deeds were punished.

I have watched as each administration “borrowed” money from the transportation fund to fund social programs and buy votes, deferred road maintenance, and left us with today’s roads. I have watched as administrations “borrowed” from the next year’s income because they “needed” the money. Indeed, I have watched as administrations “borrowed” money from the next generation—and possibly the next one after that, thus putting the burden of our profligate squandering on our children and our children’s children. What is somewhat disconcerting is that there appears to be no knowledge of what they are doing and/or no remorse for doing so. Those that attempted to thwart this reckless uncontrolled spending were demeaned and held up to criticism and ridicule.

I have watched a succession of administrations promise “change”. Each delivered “change”, but few of the changes were positive. I have watched as each succeeding administration grew government and raised taxes; then created new taxes to where half the taxes we pay did not exist 30 years ago. This month my phone bill is 36 dollars; an additional 12 dollars is taxes. That is 33%!! California is one of the most heavily taxed states in the union, and still it is “not enough”. Governor, how much IS enough?

I watched as each candidate addressed California’s problems in the election campaign. Once they were elected. California’s real problems—education, crime, prisons, welfare, drugs, pollution, gridlock, roads, etc. were ignored. I watched as the legislature addressed their “real” problems with California—gerrymandering the voting districts so that their jobs were safe and suing the people over term limits or suing them over an initiative that restricts the legislative budget. Once their jobs were safe, they then moved on to passing laws to pay back the unions, the gay community, the education community, the trial lawyers, campaign contributors, the minority community(s), and others for their support. Then they addressed trivial issues and passed petty laws merely for the sake of legislation that restricted the people’s freedom and liberty; e.g. no texting while driving.

Governor, you were my last hope. As a state employee, my job was to discover and recommend cost saving measures. I was quite good at it. What I was not good at was getting the projects implemented because the entrenched bureaucrats guarded their empires with a zeal that would do a she-bear protecting her cubs proud. When you were elected and said you wanted to hear from “the people”, I believed you and tried to assist you. (For some reason, Charlie Brown, Lucy, and a football come to mind.)

I contacted one of your directors in order to resurrect a project that would save the state tens of millions of dollars per year. There was no interest on his part.

You stated you were interested in reducing greenhouse gases, gridlock, energy dependence, and air pollution. I attempted to contact you or a member of your staff to resurrect a project that would save millions of state travel miles per year. I never did get through—your henchman was apparently too busy to return my many calls. I directed several e-mails to you that went unanswered.

I attempted to contact my state senator to inform him how the state could obtain millions of dollars in government money. There was no interest. I never got past the aide. (Follow-up showed that the aide had not even forwarded the write-up.)

I attempted to contact my assemblyman to show how to save tens of millions of dollars in state salaries. Again, I never got past the aide. I suspect he was too busy trying to get 50 more judges authorized. (see above—jobs for politicos)

May I congratulate you on the ferocity and efficiency of your gate-keepers? During my life I have had occasion to contact government officials in several states. I have yet to find a government or administration so unreachable. The security measures in place to enter state buildings emphasize the fact that the citizens who theoretically “own” the buildings are not allowed to have access to them—or the people inside.

Governor, California is hemorrhaging. The cost of renting a moving truck from Sacramento to Eugene, Oregon is $682; the cost from Eugene to Sacramento is $368. The extra cost is because the moving companies must send their employees to retrieve the trucks so they can rent them again. Not enough people are renting the trucks and driving TO California,yet the population of California is growing. That suggests that those people with enough wealth to warrant renting a moving truck are moving out; while those with enough wealth to fit in the trunk of their car are moving in. The tax base is eroding as those with wealth leave to be replaced by those without wealth. As such, housing will continue to drop, new businesses will not be started, and available capital will shrink. What’s the old joke? Half the people come to California, wait a year and then go on welfare. The other half says, “Why wait a year?”

I have done what I can for “my” state. I’m afraid I have failed. I believe it is too late to save the state; it is time for me to save myself and my family. It does not take a genius to realize that the present shortfall with the 8.7% (and climbing) unemployment rate (which will reduce the revenue from income and sales tax), the falling property values (thus reducing the property tax revenue), the falling stock market (thus reducing the capital gains tax revenue), the falling gasoline prices (thus reducing the sales/gas tax collected) and the exodus of the middle class is only the beginning. Next year will be far worse in terms of tax revenue—yet the legislature continues to spend in a “business as usual” manner. The longer action is delayed, the more onerous the action that must be taken will be. The present course of California state government is unsustainable without federal government assistance (welfare). Such would be quite ironic—California, the sixth largest economy in the world, the “golden state” with all it’s (past) wealth and glory, collecting “welfare” from the federal government. It gives a whole new meaning to the term “welfare state”! Arnold, what has become of us?

I cannot help but recall several years ago when a microphone was left on in a conference room and several legislators were caucusing. Their “deliberations” were broadcast for all to hear as they planned (schemed?) to allow a situation to worsen, blame the other party, and then use the emergency to get the 2/3 majority they needed to raise taxes. Such is the morality and ethics of our leaders. I cannot help but wonder if the present situation is the implementation of that plan.

So I am moving. California is no longer the state it once was. A succession of unethical, looting, and plundering administrations has bankrupted it socially, economically, and morally. I will take my business and my meager intellectual and financial capital with me to a place where I’m not afraid to walk down the street and I will not be faced with confiscatory taxes. I will go to a state where I can withdraw money from my IRA without “contributing” to (or the new term, “investing in”) a bloated bureaucracy. I will spend my PERS pension, my STRS pension, my Social Security, and my investment income and contribute to the economy of that state.

As a retiree, I will “take” little from that economy, but I will contribute a fair amount to it—most of which will come from your treasury. It is said that when a person leaves a state, he takes three jobs with him. I sincerely hope it is true. It will mean I will have “saved” three other people.

And so, Governor, I bid you adieu, aloha, ciao, auf wiedersehen, vaya con Dios, or however you say “goodbye” in Australian. (You DO speak Australian in Austria, don’t you? J )

Sincerely,

A soon to be former citizen of California

Related posts:

  1. Breakfast with a State Senator
  2. You Too Can Be Bought (If The Price is Right)
  3. I’M NOT AFRAID–I’M TERRIFIED
  4. What Seems To Be The Problem?
  5. How Much Are My Taxes???

9 comments on “Goodbye Arnie Part 1”


  1. Tex Norton says:

    As you know from our prior exchanges, Tony, I arrived in paradise (my definition of CA) in 1941 at age 6. I never looked back. I spent a year in Sausalito BH (before Hippies) but most of my life in SoCal. We considered ourselves very productive but laid-back at the same time.

    Word of California’s ever-expanding welfare benefits spread far and wide over the subsequent years. More and more free-loaders responded from other parts of the country. “Why suffer in the snow when we can live ‘free’ in SoCal where it’s warm all year?” And so they came; in droves.

    Both of us reached the same, ultimate conclusion that we had to leave. Interestingly, both of us also independently selected the same state for our destination. Unfortunately, I now face the same delima


  2. Tex Norton says:

    Opps – must have hit the wrong button. Sorry.

    Anyway, as I now write, I’m about to depart for the Republic of Panama on a whirlwind, fact-finding expedition. The situation has so deteriorated in this country that I believe I have no other choice than to seek refuge elsewhere.

    Doug Casey summarized my position with his statement: “I’d rather watch the events unfold on my flatscreen TV than out of my front window.”

  3. Tex,

    Amazing. A few year older than me and consequently a few years “ahead” of me, but we think in a similar vein. If you have been reading my missives (and I presume you have since you have commented on them), you know I am also considering Panama. Belize and Costa Rica is close behind.

    Please let me know what you find in Panama. I suspect I have about two years or so before I leave.

    always,
    tony

  4. (sigh) Looks like I’m going to tough it out here in the crumbling USA with my family. Pray for me.

  5. I’m looking also; maybe New Zealand? I would qualify as a skilled migrant, but the entry barriers are stiff; over $1000 as an entry levy, for example. But as long as the power-drunk control freaks run this country, who in their right mind would build a business?
    I’ll pray for you, Val, and for anyone with sense to win office and turn this around.
    JtW


  6. Desertrat says:

    Many smart people came to the US because of a better life here; more opportunities. Same for California.

    Things change, and not necessarily for the better. Okay, so move on. Go where a better life can be found with more opportunities.

    Staying in Miseryville is not a sign of smarts.

    I was born and raised in Austintatious. I boomed around the world for a dozen or so years and went home in 1963. By 1983 it looked to me WRT city government that the children had taken over the day nursery. I voted with my feet and left. Now? Well, at 78 I can’t complain about a thing. I’ll stick it out–griping all the while with Puck’s line, “What fools these mortals be.” :-)

    Were I twenty years younger, I’d move to Costa Rica. No army. More school teachers than police. Courtesy and politeness are a fetish. Very high literacy rate. Excellent medical technology. Good hunting and fishing. Excellent beer and food.


  7. Desertrat says:

    Tony, you’re certainly not alone in your opinion:

    http://pjmedia.com/victordavishanson/

  8. Tony Re;
    I suspect I have about two years or so before I leave.

    Or maybe less. Some lord high mucky muck, president of ECM or its central bank has just come out with “We are not going to let the ECM break apart.” Goerge Soros knew he was in the money when the prime minister of Britain assured the world quite venomently that they were not going to give in to “the speculators” and let the pound devalue. It used to take 6 months for the shock and awe of such a pronouncement to wear off. Lately the market has been viewing such witticisms as a sure bet it WILL happen.

    If the ECM breaks apart (Anyone want to take my previously posted bet that Germany will be back to using the DM within 2 years?) do you think the disease won’t spread to N.Amer?

    Allen

  9. Allen,

    I am a one issue person–obozocare. I had a “health issue” a few years ago, and I am convinced that under obozocare, I would now be dead due to the delays and other events that would have occurred. Suffice to say that the events were similar to Herman Cain’s, but a different affliction.

    I figger I can dodge, duck, dance, and hide from most of the stuff I see coming. I deliberately moved to rural Texas to avoid the cities (which I think will burn), planted a garden, planted fruit trees, and moved on a lake so I would have fish and water. Bought a hunting rifle and shotgun (although I have never hunted–or fished for that matter) in addition to personal protection hand guns.

    The one thing I cannot “duck” is medical care. I figger it will take them at least two years to implement it–perhaps longer. I’ll wait to see if Romney is elected and what actions he takes. A Republican Congress that refuses to fund obozocare (if obozo is re-elected) might give me even a longer time frame.

    always,
    tony

Leave a comment

Calendar

    July 2012
    M T W T F S S
    « Jun   Aug »
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    3031